Insulting people
James Joyner has this to say about George W. Bush:
The reason Bush can pull off the image of "he is a plain-spoken conservative who knows his mind and is resolute in crisis" is because that's who he is. He's not very comfortable with a teleprompter in front of him and isn't particularly good at news conferences. He is, however, quite comfortable just speaking his mind in front of ordinary folks. John Kerry (and Al Gore before him) aren't as good at it because they're plainly trying to put on an act.
To say that George W. Bush is a man of the people is an insult to people. The slick politician with the common touch is an American icon. Political folksiness was a trope in Huey Long's day. T' hear some folks talk, you'd think GW was the first politico ever to judge hogs at the state fair. Grow up, America. Rent All the King's Men, or Blaze, or any American movie featuring a politician on the campaign trail.
By all accounts, George W. Bush has great social skills. He is very comfortable making small talk with a broad cross section of friendly and deferential folks, including journalists, blue collar workers, and school children. Bush remembers people's names and asks after their kids. He smiles. He has a firm handshake. He's a good politician. But as Kevin Drum points out, Bush is also extremely uncomfortable around anyone who might question or challenge him. You wouldn't think that such a genuine and plainspoken individual would demand to be insulated by people who agree with him at all times. An emperor might demand such a thing, but not a populist President. An ordinary guy would feel weird about those loyalty pledges and besides, he'd want to communicate with ordinary Americans, not just a pre-vetted subset of flunkies.
Everyone ought to realize that plainspoken conservatism is George W. Bush's brand. It's not his life. It's not his character. It's not even his normal public behavior. Would a plain-spoken conservative have shifted his justification for war three times? What about Bush's military service? Let's hear him say something plainspoken and conservative about being AWOL. For those who think Bush is resolute in a crisis, I have three words: The Pet Goat.
Should that be All the King's Men (adaptation of Robert Penn Warren roman-a-clefish novel about Huey Long) instead of All the President's Men (Woodward and Bernstein go after Nixon)? While I'm nitpicking, apparently it's The Pet Goat.
Anyway, great post. I'd add--I'm not sure that Bush is particularly good at speaking his mind to a deferential audience. He seems to be good at chatting to a deferential audience; but not at actually communicating policy positions to them. Maybe that's because he doesn't understand his policy positions too good.
Posted by: Matt Weiner | August 16, 2004 at 07:40 PM
Thanks, Matt.
Maybe good social skills are an impediment to communicating policy. People with good social skills probably sense that their interlocutors would rather talk about something else.
Posted by: Lindsay Beyerstein | August 16, 2004 at 08:08 PM
Good catch on "The Pet Goat," Matt. I was certain you were wrong, as it's been widely quoted as "My Pet Goat," but once again, Blogosphere = 1, "Real" Media = 0.
Posted by: Thad | August 16, 2004 at 08:16 PM
Well, I got "The" from Dead Tree New Yorker, so the Real Media deserve at least an assist on that one. Now, if we combine this with Abu Ghraib, we get New Yorker 1,000,000, everyone else 0....
[Actually, I just remembered that the New Yorker cited a blog. Never mind.]
Posted by: Matt Weiner | August 17, 2004 at 02:35 PM