The money shot
Nancy Goldstein of The Raw Story asked several bloggers, including me, how we'd spend $100 for progressive politics.
« Takes a real tough guy to forcefeed a restrained detainee | Main | Yahoo sells out Chinese blogger »
Nancy Goldstein of The Raw Story asked several bloggers, including me, how we'd spend $100 for progressive politics.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61e653ef00d8345b891569e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The money shot:
» C-note run from dustbury.com
Nancy Goldstein of The Raw Story asked twenty liberal bloggers the following question: If you had $100 to invest politically, where would it go? She explains: [W]hen I queried folks,... [Read More]
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
$20 from Feingold? Don't you read The New Republic? Hillary Clinton already locked it up - like infinity years ago!
That's what I like to call TNR Article B. TNR Article A is "[ISSUE] is all about values." That way every single TNR can be expressed entirely as a rhyme structure: AABABA etc.
Posted by: Eli | February 09, 2006 at 10:02 AM
ACLU
Posted by: Gary Sugar | February 09, 2006 at 10:07 AM
I agree 100% about Feingold. He is the best thing the Democrats have going.
Posted by: mike schindhelm | February 10, 2006 at 09:58 AM
If I lived in NYC or San Francisco, I would give the $100 to a Republican or Conservative candidate, one trying to stem the tide of liberal orthodoxy.
Posted by: The Phantom | February 10, 2006 at 01:52 PM
I'd pay a hooker $100 to blow George Bush, so we could finally impeach the bastard.
Posted by: gordo | February 10, 2006 at 06:14 PM
I notice you and Avedon Carol disagree sharply about Feingold.
Posted by: Lawrence Krubner | February 11, 2006 at 07:26 PM