Pinochet remembered
Neddie Jingo shares a personal memory of Pinochet.
HT: Julia.
« Blog this, Tom DeLay: Ciro beats Bonilla in TX-23 | Main | Bush administration fights currency changes to help the blind »
Neddie Jingo shares a personal memory of Pinochet.
HT: Julia.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61e653ef00d834cedc5753ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pinochet remembered:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Chilling. One more reason the warmed-over Cold War abstractions in the WaPo valentine to Pinochet and Jeane Kirkpatrick (JK = mother of all neocons?) are so obscene. In both Chile and Iraq, realpolitik took precedence over principle, with the result that real people -- not abstractions -- were killed and tortured. Nothing can justify that. Note to WaPo editors: When the pull of abstraction gets too strong, take a moment to remember Victor Jara and what happened to him.
Posted by: Madison Guy | December 13, 2006 at 06:16 PM
Republicans get aroused when they think of a premier fascist like Pinochet - thus their love of the Busho crime family.
Posted by: shrike | December 13, 2006 at 08:49 PM
If you see the reactions, you realize that when liberals accuse right-wingers of being actual fascists, we're only exaggerating a bit. Lots of these guys have a hard-on for Pinochet.
Posted by: Barry | December 13, 2006 at 08:56 PM
I never got the impression that the American right had any objections whatsoever to Pinochet. Any complaints were always answered by drawing comparisons with an Allende regime that was avowedly socialist (horrors!) and presumed by the right to be inevitably headed towards Stalinism. If pressed on human rights abuses they’d say that he did wonders for the moribund Chilean economy, sometimes implying, but often just bluntly stating that “authoritarian” methods are the only means that would work. Years later they might occasionally allow that perhaps a tiny bit too much zeal was shown, but gosh, look at the wonderful results: Chilean fruit in February, Chilean wines, Chilean package tours to fly-fish trout or ski in the Andes. All assumed to be precluded by socialism.
I remember a lot of talk about malevolent socialist governments, like the one Pinochet mercifully extinguished, expropriating property, and what a crime that is, and what a blessing it was that Pinochet had nipped that particular terror in the bud. I don’t remember the reactionaries bemoaning the fate of workers corralled into the collectivized farms and grim factories one assumes would be their fate in the socialist Chile of the fevered right-wing imagination. All I heard was whining about property rights.
Posted by: cfrost | December 14, 2006 at 05:40 PM
I forgot to add: enjoy hell General Pinochet.
Posted by: cfrost | December 14, 2006 at 05:49 PM
Fascism=good; popularly elected "socialist"=bad. So spoke Herr Kissinger. Realpolitik is never pretty.
Posted by: namvetted | December 16, 2006 at 07:19 PM
I'm just wondering why Bruno Kirby is whispering in his ear...
Posted by: RobW | December 17, 2006 at 04:42 AM