Please visit the new home of Majikthise at bigthink.com/blogs/focal-point.

« July 2007 | Main | September 2007 »

76 posts from August 2007

August 28, 2007

Vervet and Baboon Problems

Photo: Helmut

Lindsay linked (and see also Togolosh's comment) a couple of days ago to the story of vervet monkeys destroying crops and harassing women and children in Kenya. The women tried various strategies to ward off the vervets: dressing as men, for instance, since the vervets seemed to be afraid only of the men. The vervets, however, figured out the ruse, and mocked the women, pointing at their breasts.

I have also been harassed by vervets. The vervet in the photo above stole my bananas.

I was camping in a wooded area near Lake Nakuru, and preparing a small lunch. I had a bunch of bananas which would play no small role in my lunch, dinner, and breakfast. But I made the error of turning my back on my bananas for one brief moment. The vervet, apparently watching me from a hidden spot, made its move and snatched the bananas. I gave pursuit.

Smug though we may be in our comparative evolutionary status, a hungry man versus a vervet possesses no preordained outcome. An armed vervet military would be a mighty foe indeed. The vervet was quick and smart, I must grant him that. But he was also greedy. The bunch of bananas - about eight bananas - was too heavy for the vervet. He could therefore only drag them behind him, slowing him down considerably, and keeping him from the trees. My pursuit through woods and valleys was closing the gap. I was about to dive for the bananas - honest, actually dive for them - when the vervet cut his losses by plucking one banana from the bunch and scrambling up a tree. He chattered down at me sarcastically between bites of his purloined banana. I believe I shook my fist at him, as humans are known to do when provoked.

Photo: Helmut

The same region, as nearly all of Kenya, also has a large population of baboons. The baboons in the above photo ambushed the rickety van I rented with four other people. We had hired a Kikuyu driver who suggested we roll up the windows. The baboons attacked regardless of our fortifications, baboon arms reaching wildly through the remaining cracks in the windows for anything they could grab, teeth flashing at us. Nasty creatures, baboons.

Later, further south in Kenya and Tanzania, in the great Masai Mara, I had made camp with friends in the middle of the savanna, protected from the elements and wildlife only by tents and a campfire (this was no hotel trip - I'll tell you some other time about suffering from malaria in a Nairobi bordello room furnished with a cot, one bare light bulb, a sink, and a nail in the wall with a metal coathanger).

The pure night was full of the beautiful, eerie sounds of animal and insect life. My friends and I sat around the campfire surrounded by utter blackness and heard the rare growl of a cat, the occasional bark of a hyena, and sounds we couldn't describe. We had been told in Nairobi from the man who rented us our camping gear that we should only worry about how we sleep in the tents. The animals would generally stay away. "Do not sleep with your head near the entrance. Hyenas sometimes push their heads into the tent and eat the side of your face."

That night an elephant walked through our camp while most of us were asleep. Hyenas sniffed around my tent all night, provoking a toe-curling reaction on my part. And, finally, shallow sleep for a few hours.

I was first to awaken in the morning after the driver (he slept in the van), who had the campfire going again and some coffee already made. He and I sat around the fire for warmth and chatted about the sounds during the night, sharing a laugh about the elephant roaming through camp (which he had chased off with a stick and yelling), and planning the day's activities.

Then he suddenly said, "uh oh," looking past me. I turned around. A baboon was sitting in front of my tent. He was facing us, looking straight at me, nearly immobile. One of the baboon's hands, however, was reaching behind his back slowly and quietly unzipping the door to my tent.

I grabbed a stick from the fire and gave pursuit....

(Cross-posted at Phronesisaical).

August 26, 2007

Pastor Calls for Death of Church-State Separationists

From the Baltimore Sun, August 26, 2007:

Until last week, "imprecatory prayer" was not in many people's vocabularies.

But then the Rev. Wiley S. Drake, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Buena Park, Calif., urged his supporters to use Psalm 109 to focus prayers directed at the "enemies of God" - including the leaders of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

...

The controversy flared Aug. 14, the day the Washington-based group asked the Internal Revenue Service to probe the tax-exempt status of Drake's congregation.

...
Under the heading, "HOW TO PRAY," he listed all 31 verses of Psalm 109, in which King David appeals to divine justice. Drake provided his congregation the King James Version of the psalm, including Verse 9, which says: "Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow."

This is Bruce Godfrey, aka "The Crab", spewing anti-theocratic bile from the sleepy "Serial Mom" suburbs of Baltimore, Maryland.

When some Muslims in the Middle East call down "death to America" because of our foreign policy, we are understandably concerned.  Our error comes when we fail to sound the alarm at domestic radical clerics who call down death and grievous misery upon their critics and their families. I don't expect that God will smite down the leadership of Americans United for the same reason that God did not smite down Dover, PA, after Pat Robertson filed a celestial application for a terrestrial smiting of that town.   The reason that God did not smite down Dover when its school board decided to comply with common sense, the law and a court order in ceasing to engage in religious instruction in its schools under the rubric of intelligent design is simple: God does not exist, a fatal flaw in God's professional qualifications for the position of  celestial smiter of wingnuttery's critics. 

The "not existing" part is hard to overcome in the job interview. What does concern me, however, is terrestrial smiters, such as those who vandalized the Unitarian Universalist church near my home for its brazen failure to be homophobic and doctrinally orthodox as defined by several presumably (for that county) Protestant critics who spray-painted their theological and moral criticisms in the dark of night.  Their more violent brethren might not use spray paint but powder and lead to render someone's wife a widow and his children fatherless.  Abortion clinic bombers and arguably even Timothy McVeigh follow logically from the same sort of mentality.

It should be noted that Americans United asked only that the IRS investigate a probable violation of the tax code.  Churches may indeed endorse political candidates but ONLY if the churches don't ask the federal government for a special exemption from income taxes for the church itself AND for their donor flock to the extent of their donations/fees/dues, etc.  This church has been living tax free in exchange for being a so-called charity, though "member-supported private social organization" seems a fairer description factually unless the church is actually feeding the poor and sheltering the homeless, rather than reading ancient manuscripts about doing the same.  This church pretty blatantly violated this law according to reports.  So AU asked the government to take a look; the response from the church was a call for the killing of AU's executives, allegedly by "God" but presumably in practice by someone else.  Since God does not exist, it's his followers who have to clear the "celestial in-box" of required smitings filed by our nation's radical clerics. 

This story passed almost without notice in the American "press."  I recall another nation, one less flirtatious with or accommodating of right-wing religious violence.  Did I actually hallucinate the USA of my elementary school years?

Sue Scheff "child advocate" exposed

Maia Szalavitz has an excellent expose of self-proclaimed child advocate Sue Scheff.

Greetings from London

This post comes to you from the Apple computer store in London. (Free terminals!)

Expect photos soon.

I'm going to be away for the until September 12, but I'll be updating as much as I can.

Anyone who has previously guest blogged and has a password is welcome to post anytime.

August 24, 2007

CIA steps up operations in Iran

RAW STORY exclusive: Larisa Alexandrovna reports on the CIA's redoubled efforts to create a pretext for war with Iran.

Vervets besiege women and children in Kenya


Vervet Monkey, originally uploaded by Rivertay.

Vervet monkeys are selectively targeting women and children in a Kenyan village. [BBC]

Polka dot squid

More ceph.

Courtesy of Loren.

August 23, 2007

Ceph Thursday


octopussy, originally uploaded by april cakes.

Today's FlicrkFind.

August 22, 2007

Perverse Justice: Padilla, solitary, and the brain

My latest column for In These Times is up.

It's about how solitary confinement and coercive interrogation destroyed Jose Padilla's mental faculties.

August 21, 2007

PZ Myers sued over negative book review

Prominent skeptic and science blogger PZ Myers is in the middle of a legal battle because he had the temerity to pan some crank's book (twice!).

The embittered author, Dr. Stuart Pivar, filed a lawsuit against Myers' publisher in New York's Southern District Court on August 16th.

Andrea Bottaro of Panda's Thumb reports that Pivar is seeking $15 million in damages from Myers and his publisher Seed Media Company.

Pivar claims he was libeled why Myers described him as a "classic crackpot." Here's my favorite part of the complaint (pdf):

16. On July 12, 2007, Defendant Myers maliciously, and without cause, defamed Plaintiff by referring to him as "a classic crackpot."

17. Upon information and belief, Defendant Myers' references to Plaintiff as "a classic crackpot" were necessarily intended to disparage Plaintiff's abilities as a scientific enquirer and were intended to hold Plaintiff up to ridicule and embarrassment in this specific area of Plaintiff's professional endeavors.

18. Myer's defamatory remarks were made with actual malice; Myers called Plaintiff "a classic crackpot" fully knowing that statement to be false as a statement of fact and in reckless disregard of the truth about Plaintiff because Myer's knew full well, the time of publishing his defamatory statement that no scientist holding the international reputation ofany of Hazen, Sasselov, Goodwin or Tyson would endorse or review the work of a crackpot.

19. Myers has publicly described himself on his web log as a "cruel and insensitive person".

Grampa Simpson couldn't have said it better himself!