CIA program murdered suspected drug smugglers
The lede of this story is that the CIA helped down the wrong plane in 2001 and lied about it:
An internal CIA probe has concluded that agency officials deliberately misled Congress, the White House and federal prosecutors about key details of the 2001 downing of an airplane carrying U.S. missionaries in Peru, according to a senior lawmaker who called yesterday for a new criminal inquiry into the case.
The agency's inspector general said CIA officers repeatedly ignored rules of engagement in a joint U.S.-Peruvian campaign to halt airborne drug smugglers, resulting in the downing of at least 10 other aircraft without proper warnings. Afterward, CIA managers concealed the problems from lawmakers and the Justice Department, the agency watchdog said. [WaPo]
That's bad enough. Far more outrageous is the revelation that the CIA was systematically engaged in a program to shoot down planes on the mere suspicion that they were carrying drugs.
Even if they guess correctly, that's cold blooded murder.
The controversial anti-drug program operated from 1995 to 2001 to assist Peru in stopping drug traffickers from ferrying narcotics through the country's airspace. CIA officers in small planes would track flights by suspected drug runners before alerting Peruvian fighter pilots, who would swoop in for the kill. [WaPo]
It's a worldwide scandal that the CIA kidnaps and tortures suspected terrorists.
Here, the CIA made itself judge, jury, and executioner for far less. Simply riding in a plane that might have been carrying drugs carried a potential death sentence.
According to the article, this particular program has been discontinued. For all we know, similar efforts could be ongoing.
It's time for another Church Committee.


Damn, I thought this shit went out after Reagan. It's not just cold blooded murder. These acts, and the subsequent cover-up, circumvent Peruvian, US and international law. This is antithetical to every thing American.
Lying to Congress and/or federal prosecutors is de rigueur for the Bush Administration. I think it's scary enough that the CIA trashed the laws of the land(s), ditched rules of engagement and "accidentally" killed US citizens. But then they kept it from the President!
Makes me wonder if there's anything else the spooks huddled at Langley would like to tell their boss.
-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
Posted by: Anacher Forester | November 21, 2008 at 05:12 AM
See also the use of armed UAVs to destroy vehicles believed to be carrying terrorists in various countries.
You'd like to think so... But the truth is, it's quintessentially American. This sort of thing has been going on more-or-less continuously for over a century.
Posted by: Dunc | November 21, 2008 at 08:04 AM
"cold blooded murder" the official term is "summary execution". Things are always different when carried out by part of the apparatus of a state.
Posted by: me | November 21, 2008 at 08:50 AM
And how do we know it was cancelled? Because the CIA told us! After all, they wouldn't lie to us (yet again), would they?
Posted by: RepubAnon | November 21, 2008 at 09:14 AM
I have no sympathy for any dead drug dealers, but we simply cannot devote resources to this unwinnable effort anymore, one that causes so many distortions in our country and in other countries.
Drugs should be legalized / decriminalized.
For too many reasons to get into here.
Posted by: The Phantom | November 21, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Thanks for publicizing this. Bring on the Truth Commission.
Minor point: It sounds like they only appointed themselves judge and jury. The executioner part was outsourced to the Peruvian military. Not that that makes any real difference.
Posted by: John Callender | November 21, 2008 at 09:44 AM
In general, it has been considered most healthy within the U.S. foreign policy establishment for the U.S. government, mostly via the CIA (but through other organizations as well) to help Latin American leaders kill various targets without charges.
Daily, in Colombia -- and even in the USA, given the US trial of the extradited Mancuso -- paramilitaries testify to higher and higher degrees of Colombian government support for the narco-paramilitary death squads.
Posted by: El Cid | November 21, 2008 at 10:44 AM
If the CIA is murdering drug smugglers, it's probably to eliminate the competition:
www.madcowprods.com
Your tax dollars at work.
Posted by: NoOneYouKnow | November 21, 2008 at 05:26 PM
All drug dealers do 'drive-by' shootings to limit competition, establish territorial rights and warn others of their ruthlessness.... sometimes innocent bystanders get shot up. No big thing just the accidents of 'free market economics'!
Posted by: chaka | November 21, 2008 at 08:18 PM
There is probably more to this story than meets the eye. The people shot down were from my area so it was fairly big news when it happened. Sadly I recall only the outlines of the story. I do recall this however. The story that they were simple Christian missionaries seemed to me to be a little suspect. On what grounds I actually don't recall.
It is a murky world down there in the coca jungles. The trigger happy story could well be true. Just don't take it as certain.
The story was trumpeted today by our congress critter. Pete Hoekstra, Bush boot licker extraordinaire. Congressman for life who is a dumb as they come. Ranking minority member of the House Intelligence Committee. He was chairman of the committee after that Goss guy was made CIA director. The guy who helped purge the place of every Iraq war doubter while pinning the blame for the faulty intelligence on the CIA. So cute. Goss put his buddy in as Number 3. The now convicted Dusty Foggo, friend of convicted Brent Wilkes who was a friend convicted congressman Randy Duke Cunningham, considered the crookedest of the breed in modern times. But I digress.
Why a report now, 7 years later? Well let's see. Some poor Christians slaughtered at the hands of the CIA. Let's start shining some lights over there, now that the Democrats are back in charge.
Posted by: rapier | November 21, 2008 at 08:58 PM
The Bush administrations CIA lied, how is this even a story, the credibility of the CIA, FDA and every other government agency under the bush administration has been nothing but a miserable disappointment, these people should not only resign but should commit seppuku, they dishonor not only themselves but anyone who's ever served this Country.
Posted by: Sailingwindward | November 21, 2008 at 09:10 PM
Look, it's not the role of intelligence or law enforcement to kill people on spec, regardless of what they are known or suspected to have done.
Punishments are for people who are tried and convicted, not people who are merely suspected to have done wrong, let alone for anyone who might just happen to be riding in a plane with someone who is suspected to have done wrong.
Let's say the NYPD believes that the worst drug dealer/murderer/terrorist sympathizer in the city is escaping. They can't just take him or her out right there, and they can't even give chase if they think they might hurt an innocent person.
Are you suggesting that suspected criminals in the jungles of Colombia are somehow "less than" suspected criminals on the streets of New York, and if so, why?
Posted by: Lindsay Beyerstein | November 21, 2008 at 09:53 PM
A new Church Committee is way overdue. The ‘you’ve got to break a few eggs to make an omelet’ mentality has run completely out of control over the last few years.
As for the cocaine mob, the easiest way to take the wind, i.e. profits, out of their sails would be to legalize the chewing of coca leaf in the United States and other major cocaine market countries. If the coca farmers had an alternate and legal market for their crop, they, and we, would be better off. The concentration of cocaine in coca leaf is so low that it is quite impossible to become an addlebrained crackhead by chewing it. If you want to become a strung-out dope fiend with the leaf, you’ll have to pencil in the time to munch through a wheelbarrow load twice a day to do it. Sell it in supermarkets just like coffee and tea; the drugs with which coca leaf is best classified. Chew a wad to shake off post-lunch drowsiness at work. Wake yourself up to read, or worse, write that dreary report. You won’t get addicted. You won’t lose your teeth, or your job. You won’t cheat on your wife or beat your kids. Next time you’re in the Andean states, try it, you’ll see.
Posted by: cfrost | November 22, 2008 at 01:00 AM
Let's say the NYPD believes that the worst drug dealer/murderer/terrorist sympathizer in the city is escaping. They can't just take him or her out right there, and they can't even give chase if they think they might hurt an innocent person.
I think this somewhat overstates the restrictions imposed on NYPD officers in pursuit of suspects.
Posted by: parse | November 22, 2008 at 01:52 AM
If this program was from 1995-2001, then it seems to me that saying that this is a general function of "the credibility of the CIA, FDA and every other government agency under the bush administration has been nothing but a miserable disappointment" doesn't apply especially well to this case.
Posted by: Julian Elson | November 23, 2008 at 04:53 AM
Julian
C'mon. Stick to the groupthink that generally applies here. Bush is the devil. If there is an earthquake tomorrow, its all the fault of GW Bush
Posted by: The Phantom | November 23, 2008 at 11:53 AM
The devil? I think you're carrying that "banality of evil" concept a bit too far.
Posted by: Cass | November 23, 2008 at 12:33 PM
Damn, I thought this shit went out after Reagan.
The US has invaded Latin America a three-figure number of times in the last 200 years. Do you really think it was all Reagan's fault?
Let's say the NYPD believes that the worst drug dealer/murderer/terrorist sympathizer in the city is escaping. They can't just take him or her out right there, and they can't even give chase if they think they might hurt an innocent person.
I always thought NYPD would just shoot him on the spot if he angered them too much.
Posted by: Alon Levy | November 23, 2008 at 03:43 PM
What the Church Committee investigated ... continues. Coming attractions of COINTELPRO, (what the Church committee investigated), coming to a street near you can be previewed at the URL above.
Posted by: 70show | November 23, 2008 at 06:21 PM
Let's try that again with the referenced link:
http://www.freedomfchs.com/unwarranted_surveillance.pdf
What the Church Committee investigated ... continues. Coming attractions of COINTELPRO, (what the Church committee investigated), coming to a street near you can be previewed at the URL above.
Posted by: 70show | November 23, 2008 at 06:24 PM
I think you're carrying that "banality of evil" concept a bit too far.
Bush doesn't even rise to the level of banality.
The rogue intelligence agency thing may have preceded his misreign, but he's done what exactly to stop it? Um, um. . . I'm sure I'll think of something. . .
Posted by: cfrost | November 23, 2008 at 10:11 PM
"If this program was from 1995-2001, then it seems to me that saying that this is a general function of "the credibility of the CIA, FDA and every other government agency under the bush administration has been nothing but a miserable disappointment" doesn't apply especially well to this case."
Good job there was a Republican Congress and House of Reps to provide oversight and prevent such abuses, huh? We can rest assured that the CIA didn't abort any babies, turn off any life support machines, take away anyone's guns (in the US, anyway) or allow any gay people to get married.
Posted by: me | November 24, 2008 at 12:38 PM