Adorable yet terrifying
Is it that a passed out Panda banner doesn't really strike fear into the hearts of liberal-haters everywhere? Maybe if we replaced it with one that had fangs and blood dripping from its mouth.--Amanda
Well, we tried that, but Jesse and Amanda of Pandagon still haven't been "discovered" by David Horowitz's Network.
It's time for a new tack...something adorable, yet terrifying...something Pandariffic but haunting.
It's waiting below just below the fold.
Baby pandas at the Washington zoo. [Yahoo/AP]
Correction/Clarification: Baby pandas be bustin' out all over!
July 12, 2005—Forget sharks: The summer of the panda is upon us, and it's padding in on 20 pink paws. Last week alone five giant panda cubs were born in captivity: one at Washington, D.C.'s National Zoo and two pairs of twins (one of which is pictured above) at China's Wolong panda reserve. [National Geographic]
Chest-bursters! NOOOOOOO!!!!!
Posted by: norbizness | July 14, 2005 at 10:53 AM
As the caption on the photo says, those two baby pandas are at the "China Giant Panda Protection and Research Center in Wolong". There was only a single baby panda born at the National Zoo in Washington (although it was just as cute).
Posted by: Me | July 14, 2005 at 11:54 AM
We have a species finally where the adults are cuter than the babies! I always suspected Pandas were unbent.
Posted by: Amanda | July 14, 2005 at 12:28 PM
Eat your hearts out, naked mole rats! Her is the TRUE embodiment of blind ambition! ^..^
Posted by: Herbert Browne | July 14, 2005 at 02:49 PM
Iä! Iä! Cthulhu ftaghn!
Posted by: Alan Bostick | July 14, 2005 at 03:17 PM
Must one be influential to join the network, or merely be loathesome? I think I can manage the second part pretty well. So what if no one listens? I'm an insidious evil that must be stomped out, no? That I fly under the radar, so much the better to stomp on.
Posted by: Horatio | July 14, 2005 at 06:06 PM
OMFG... This was not someone doing a parody of David Horowitz, this thing was serious?!
And if so, how do I get myself added to the list?
mojo sends
Posted by: vanmojo | July 14, 2005 at 08:11 PM
Must one be influential to join the network, or merely be loathesome?
Apparently, making David Horowitz look like an ass helps. If we want to be part of The Network, I think we may have to make fun of him more.
Posted by: Amanda Marcotte | July 14, 2005 at 08:54 PM
I was discovered by Horowitz and I gotta tell ya that it ain't all that.
Posted by: Roxanne | July 14, 2005 at 10:15 PM
Apparently death is no barrier to making Horowitz's enemies list. I see that both Andrea Dworkin and Valerie Solanis made his "Leftist Gender Bigots" list:
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/LGB.asp
And it isn't just that Horowitz doesn't have time to update his site. In the entry on Dworkin it notes the date of her death.
Valerie Solanis died in 1988.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton also made the Leftist Gender Bigots list. She died in 1902.
So if Stanton is on Horowitz's enemies list, why isn't Marx, Darwin, Einstein and Abbie Hoffman?
Posted by: Nancy | July 15, 2005 at 12:05 AM
He's a slow reader, I guess.
Posted by: Lindsay Beyerstein | July 15, 2005 at 12:15 AM
He's a slow reader, I guess.
Perhaps - or maybe crazy people have problems with consistency and orderly categories.
Posted by: Nancy | July 15, 2005 at 12:19 AM
orderly categories.
Was that me or a thread glitch?
Posted by: Nancy | July 15, 2005 at 12:26 AM
OMG, those babies are amazing.
But no one is citing what MUST be Jesse's original source: Rumiko Takahashi's pugnacious genderbending manga, http://www.furinkan.com/ranma/ =blank>Ranma 1/2, whose character "Genma" spends half his life as a slighly lecherous grandpa, until contact with water turns him into an equally pugnacious bear (until he dries out).
To leave Genma behind because of Horowitz -- well, the terrorists will have won.
Posted by: Chris | July 15, 2005 at 08:44 AM
Wow. I didn't know pandas were marsupials....
Posted by: janet | July 15, 2005 at 01:33 PM
Chris: it's not until he dries out; cold water turns him into a panda, hot water turns him back again.
Posted by: Richard | July 15, 2005 at 07:39 PM
I stand corrected! Thanks, Richard.
Posted by: Chris | July 16, 2005 at 05:54 AM