Please visit the new home of Majikthise at bigthink.com/blogs/focal-point.

« Mental health in eminent jazz musicians | Main | Fear Factor ministry »

October 06, 2005

It's elitist to demand mediocrity

Varifrank writes:

This idea that has developed as of late that Supreme Court Justices are or should be “super human smart guys” is just crap and frankly I think its dangerous for the Republic. I think that fundamentally, the nomination of Mrs. Miers is an antidote for that poisonous idea. We’ve had our quota on the Supreme Court for women and minorities, now we have a slot for the “average American”. Yes, she is a lawyer, but she’s the least lawyer to be on the court in quiet some time and frankly I find that really refreshing and not a handicap at all.

Yup, demanding mediocrity from Supreme Court nominees is so 1970:

"Even if he is mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they?" - Roman Hruska in defense of Nixon's Supreme Court nominee Harold Carswell on the charges that he was 'mediocre'.

Damned elitists.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61e653ef00d8345a3ca469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference It's elitist to demand mediocrity:

» Populist aristocracy from Pandagon
I'm loving the argument that it's somehow elitist to oppose the nomination of Harriet Miers because you think she's unqualified. I just fear one day we'll flip on the radio to hear Rush Limbaugh and company wailing about the liberal... [Read More]

Comments

You know, the funny thing is, I feel that the 70's, they are returning in other areas of our lives.

People are represented by their Congress Persons, their Senators and their President. All of them can be the bastions of mediocrity (I wish they all reached that level) and less than average intelligence. When it comes to thinking great thoughts about issues of vital social importance _and_ the person can't be removed from the office...I'll take smart, thanks.

I don't have any problems with her qualifications as there now known. It's what there not telling us that bothers me.

I always thought George Romney, Mitt's dad, said that. Guess I'm older and more delusional than I thought. Now where are those car keys...?

You're forgetting the anti-Semitic punchline to Hruska's speech: "They can't all be Cardozos and Frankfirters and stuff like that there."

Just imagine how they'll react if we ever get a philosopher on the Court. :-)

Scott: You forgot Brandeis - he made Hruska's "intellectual" list as well.

The great thing about arguing in favor of stupidity: if someone first buys an argument in favor of it, you can't argue them out of it. How would you? With an intelligent argument?

"The great thing about arguing in favor of stupidity: if someone first buys an argument in favor of it, you can't argue them out of it. How would you? With an intelligent argument?"

How about an even more stupid argument! If that fails there's always name calling and insults to their mother.

But that wouldn't argue them out of it, just further into it--when attacked in response, stupid arguers entrench themselves in their stupid arguments, like a contracting version of Chinese fingercuffs.

The comments to this entry are closed.