Friday (putative) octo-blogging
Boingboing on the mysterious case of the drain-clogging octopus of Staffordshire.
« Who's at Gitmo? | Main | VA nurse investigated for sedition for letter to editor »
Boingboing on the mysterious case of the drain-clogging octopus of Staffordshire.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61e653ef00d834a89e3869e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Friday (putative) octo-blogging:
The comments to this entry are closed.
but but but..what about random friday? *sniff*
(one of these days the admin is going to yell, shut up at me. :D )
hmmm...fried octopus.
Posted by: Squashed Lemon | February 10, 2006 at 04:03 PM
off topic, off topic, but this is a good idea.
MJK, should modify the Friday random ten from iTune to reader link submission. (set some rule say... one link for each person, first ten persons will be posted. Only legal mp3 etc. or if it is too hard, only gray+legal mp3.)
bad song submission will be subject of endless joke and whining for the entire weekend. haaa....! (imagine the length of thread people arguing over bad/good music each week. We'll need riot gears.)
Posted by: Squashed Lemon | February 10, 2006 at 04:37 PM
Maybe you could satisfy everyone by calling this section the "Friday random eight."
Posted by: gordo | February 10, 2006 at 05:33 PM
well, maybe we should adopt an octopus pet mascot or something for the regular thread.
Flickr 'octopus tag'
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/octopus/clusters/
the best must see
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wackydoodler/7252239/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomaso/50197534/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/monana7/86482677/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/96063213@N00/6342009/
okay I am done. you can see the rest of 200+ pictures here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/octopus/clusters/aquarium-tentacles-seattle/
Posted by: Squashed Lemon | February 10, 2006 at 06:16 PM
I chose an octopus album cover to be our mascot. See above.
Posted by: Lindsay Beyerstein | February 10, 2006 at 06:52 PM
adding on top of octopus,
they say they find the solution for einstein general theory of relativity. (which also says anti gravity exist and we can travel near speed of light.) Don't tell the octopus, they are going to take over the universe before us.
oh ps. the soln. hasn't been checked yet. So he could be very wrong. In that case. I still think fried octopus is as delicious as calamari.
http://www.physorg.com/news10789.html
Felber's calculations show how to use the repulsion of a body speeding through space to provide the enormous energy needed to accelerate massive payloads quickly with negligible stress. The new solution of Einstein's field equation shows that the payload would 'fall weightlessly' in an antigravity beam even as it was accelerated close to the speed of light.
Posted by: Squashed Lemon | February 11, 2006 at 06:15 PM
uhmmm, quick update. He seems to be a crank. Well, I am going out for a fried calamari.
http://science.slashdot.org/science/06/02/11/1819208.shtml
this is funny (Physic crackpot index. Somebody posted it in answer to the theory)
A simple method for rating potentially revolutionary contributions to physics:
1. A -5 point starting credit.
2. 1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.
3. 2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.
4. 3 points for every statement that is logically inconsistent.
5. 5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful correction.
...more
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
Posted by: Squashed Lemon | February 11, 2006 at 06:24 PM
Squashed--
I like the crackpot list. Whenever someone talks about a theory for an antigravity device, I think of Robert Park's observation: with an antigravity device, one could build a perpetual motion machine. Just make an unbalanced wheel that spins half in and half out of your antigravity field. With this device, you could generate unlimited energy. Therefore, until you can figure out a way around conservation of energy, there's no use trying to build an antigravity device.
It's kind of like Hawking's debunking of the possibility of time travel. If it's possible, we'll develop it someday. Which means we'd have already met time travellers from the future.
Posted by: gordo | February 11, 2006 at 08:35 PM