Please visit the new home of Majikthise at

« 3,154 American troops have died in Iraq war | Main | Scott Shields and Amanda Marcotte »

March 03, 2007

American and Iraqi forces raid Iraqi trade unions in Baghdad

US and Iraqi forces raided the offices of the General Federation of Iraqi Workers on February 23, according to an official statement by the GFIW. This raid may be the latest episode in the long and adversarial relationship between American occupying forces and Iraq's secular, anti-Baathist trade union movement.

It is not surprising that Iraqi trade unions leaders have been targeted by both insurgents and occupying forces. Iraqi unions have undergone a resurgence since the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. However, union power is a potential threat to both fundamentalist clerics and the international corporations seeking to privatize Iraq's oil industry.

The US-backed Iraqi government approved a sweeping new privatization package for Iraq's oil industry last Monday. Labor leaders were shut out of the negotiations leading up to the new hydrocarbon law.

The law was prepared by a three-member Iraqi cabinet committee, dominated by the Kurds and the Shi'ites. It is now expected to be ratified by Parliament because the powerful faction leaders in the government have cleared it.

The first draft was seen only by the Iraqi technocrats who penned it, nine international oil companies, the British and US governments, and the International Monetary Fund. The Iraqi Parliament will get its first glimpse next week.

Concerns about the process are compounded because of the ongoing disputes in Iraq over the legitimacy of the cabinet and the Parliament, which have been constructed by the governing council, which itself was created in 2004 by occupation forces along sectarian lines.

In a speech last month by Hassan Juma, head of the Iraqi Oil Labor Union, posted on the union's website, he called on the Iraqi government to consult with Iraqi oil experts and "ask their opinion before sinking Iraq into an ocean of dark injustice".

The content of the law has also worried international campaigners and local Iraqi groups who say that it puts Iraqi oil wealth firmly on the path to full privatization. [Asia Times]

Kathlyn Stone has a fascinating article about Iraqi labor and the oil industry. Her reporting on the fight between the General Union of Oil Employees and Halliburton subsidiary KBR is of particular interest:

The General Union of Oil Employees in Basra has taken a strong stand against the proposed law. GUOE's courageous members booted KBR, the Halliburton subsidiary, out of refinery workplaces shortly after the invasion despite Cheney's award of a 'no bid' contract. Members also went on a two-day strike last August, winning their demands for higher pay. From what one can glean from foreign press and unfiltered words from Iraq, so does every other union in Iraq. In his February 6 speech at a conference held at Basra University to debate the oil law, GUOE president Hassan Jumaa Awad al Assadi minced no words. "Among the objectives America wishes to achieve from the military occupation of Iraq, all the causes of which we do not want to return to, but simply to emphasize one central objective of the American political leaders who crossed oceans and wasted billions of dollars, that is Iraqi oil. Indeed we in the Federation of Oil Unions consider this the most important reason for this foul war."

Assadi, who was jailed three times for opposing the former Baath regime, called on Iraq's Parliament to "bear the Iraqis in mind, to protect the national wealth, and to look at the neighboring countries. Have they introduced such laws even when their relations with foreign companies are closer than in Iraq? If those calling for production-sharing agreements insist on acting against the will of Iraqis, we say to them that history will not forgive those who play recklessly with the wealth and destiny of a people and that the curse of heaven and the fury of Iraqis will not leave them."

The oil workers must be braced for a response. After GUOE's first anti-privatization conference last summer, the U.S. and Iraqi governments responded by freezing the union's bank accounts.

Union members have been arrested and fired from their jobs. At least two union leaders, Hadi Saleh, of the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unionists (IFTU) and Ali Hassan Abd of the GUOE, were assassinated since the invasion.

Saddam Hussein's 1987 Law 150, banning unions and union organizing remains in effect. In 2004 U.S. administrator Paul Bremer declared them illegal. [Truthout]

A separate attack on the headquarters of an Iraqi journalists' union last month provoked international outrage from the International Federation of Journalists (the union's parent organization), Reporters Without Borders, and labor groups. Reporters Without Boarders says that US troops fired on the Baghdad building, but the US military denies that American troops were involved in the attack.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference American and Iraqi forces raid Iraqi trade unions in Baghdad:


A country under occupation giving up the rights to its oil, is like a man with gun to his head giving up his wallet.

Yet another fun side effect of having a developing country's administration be run by a pack of doctrinaire neo-cons that haven't held down a real job since Scaife started tossing money around.

(Nothing like handing over the reins to guys with as much experience running a government as your typical flatworm. It shows, too.)

Still, while it's terrible to contemplate, are any of these sorts of deals actually going to survive the United States leaving Iraq? I don't know about you, Lindsay, but I thoroughly doubt it. Nationalizing will be the first thing a post-American government will campaign on, and they'll win.

Glad to see the young Republicans running Iraq still have their priorities in order. Securing weapons sites? Fixing the electrical grid? Hell - that's boring! Let's go hit some union offices!

Who are the young republicans? Just wondering?

The "anti-imperlialist" wing of the anti-war movement basically has supported the vicious sectarian killers that murdered and torturted Hadi Saleh. Anti-war rallies in the US (but even more so in England) have featured speakers supporting these thugs. Ever wonder why the anti-war movement seems to be in reverse even though the American public anti-war oppostion continues to get bigger?

Does anyone know how to transliterate a scoff? Because I'd really like to communicate some disgust here.

If ever, in the entire Iraq blunder, there were something that seemed to have Dick Cheney's cynical self-service about it, it has to be union-busting in the new Iraq, by force.

>Nationalizing will be the first thing a post-American government will campaign on, and they'll win.

I won't bet against you, Demosthenes. And if a sort of socialist corporatism emerges, with a religious populist government dictating the running of all the major industries plus the banking policies of Iraq, then I would bet the person they'll be studying is Hugo Chavez. But how do these screw-the-working class management types think we'll feel about this sort of thing? I don't think, as the Marxist does, that the entire world revolves around class, but am I supposed to support the decimation of my own (middle) class, or the third (working) class, in order to pay obeisance to the holy, priestly (upper) class?

Forget it. A guy likes a carrot with his stick.

Several years ago, Paul Bremer and the CPA passed an edict requiring every Iraqi farmer to buy their seeds from some American agri-giant (Monsanto, I think). Worse, the required seeds were genetically engineered to be sterile, so the farmers would be forced to buy a new supply every year. As repulsive as the law was, I also thought it was kind of a joke, since the Iraqis would never enforce it and the Americans could never make enforcement a priority. Maybe I was guilty of forgetting where our government's priorities lie.

It's less about labor than about fascism. Trade unions have an annoying tendency to form independent civil society structures that have a stake in democracy; therefore, authoritarian leaders - including socialists like Chavez, incidentally - do their best to crack down on free union activity.

Lindsey - To follow up on that earlier mention, Just to note , Sherwin Nuland's son in law in being interviewed tonight on c-span for an hour. Eight and Eleven. About foreign policy history, and the history of the Iraq project,

>Several years ago, Paul Bremer and the CPA passed an edict requiring every Iraqi farmer to buy their seeds from some American agri-giant (Monsanto, I think). Worse, the required seeds were genetically engineered to be sterile, so the farmers would be forced to buy a new supply every year.

God, Cass--not to start another atheists-vs.-religious people thread, but who knew it would be a religious President* who would institute the one-world government most closely resembling the one in Revelations?

When Italy voted to ban all such genetically modified seed (lest it cross-breed with local flora, with unforeseen consequences), I had the feeling I was watching David vs. Goliath. Freaked me out. I hope David wins, and Monsanto loses.

The comments to this entry are closed.