Do you blog like a girl?
Israeli researchers have developed an algorithm to guess a writer's gender based on a sample of their prose.
Try the Gender Genie.
No warranties expressed or implied.
[HT: Loren]
« Vancouver HDR | Main | Feingold questions Gonzales »
Israeli researchers have developed an algorithm to guess a writer's gender based on a sample of their prose.
Try the Gender Genie.
No warranties expressed or implied.
[HT: Loren]
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61e653ef00d8341cffac53ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Do you blog like a girl?:
» The Gender Genie Thinks I'm Male from konagod
I suppose it works pretty well. [Read More]
The comments to this entry are closed.
I've tried many different samples of my writing and there doesn't seem to be any way to escape the conclusion that I write like a great big girl. Also, I'm bad at throwing things accurately. *sigh*
Posted by: Andrew Myers | April 19, 2007 at 03:02 PM
Eszter has been over some of this territory before:
http://eszter.com/research/a17-genderskills.html
Posted by: greensmile | April 19, 2007 at 03:11 PM
I've tried many different samples of my writing and there doesn't seem to be any way to escape the conclusion that I write like a great big girl. Also, I'm bad at throwing things accurately. *sigh*
I was very close to gender neutral, which is perfectly fine to me.
Posted by: Count Zero | April 19, 2007 at 03:11 PM
It correctly called my most recent blog post as male. However, almost the entire margin (which was pretty large) was attributed to my use of the words "the" and "a". Call me crazy, but I'd bet that female writers find those words pretty darn useful as well.
Posted by: Fred Vincy | April 19, 2007 at 03:23 PM
interesting to think all the "insignificant" words in the writing samples have such significance. I pulled three samples from my posts on feminist topics and my gender still stuck out like, uh, um, well, its not a roll of life savers in my pocket.
Posted by: greensmile | April 19, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Thats actually funny/wierd: since my nom de blog is of no obvious gender, I sometimes get comments or replies to comments that refer to me as "she".
Is like pheromones: very gender specific but we have lost the ability to sense it.
Posted by: greensmile | April 19, 2007 at 03:31 PM
A bunch of other paramters come to mind:
sexual orientation,
UK english vs US English
Regional dialect
I'd bet they all profile a bit differently
Posted by: greensmile | April 19, 2007 at 03:33 PM
It got me wrong. My sample was read as male. Of course I've always felt my socialization as a girl never really "took".
Posted by: johanna202 | April 19, 2007 at 04:22 PM
It blew chunks on every one of my samples; missed the gender every time. Silly program.
Posted by: dejah | April 19, 2007 at 05:22 PM
I'm male if I give it my academic papers, but if I give it my abortive attempts at fiction writing, I'm female. . .
Posted by: Gian dei Brughi | April 19, 2007 at 06:47 PM
Being one who wants his writing to appeal to as broad an audience as possible I jumped for joy (well, Ok, I pumped my fist. Once.) when it first classified a blog entry as "I'm female."
Longer pieces identified as male, though they were all fairly evenly matched (hooray). I included one about hip hop and left in the lyrics from a few. Then I took out all the lyrics, since they weren't my writing. When I took OUT the lyrics I was more of a man. ???
Yeah, the word choice is odd, as well. "Around" is a male word??????. O-kaaaaay.
Gian's observation is interesting.
Posted by: Temple Stark | April 19, 2007 at 08:34 PM
I tried the first 400 words of Pride and Prejudice. How much more estogen-soaked can you get? It came out "male."
Posted by: Joe S. | April 19, 2007 at 10:44 PM
I used different blog posts and either scored as a guy or a girl.
Posted by: Michael HUssey | April 19, 2007 at 10:46 PM
Interesting. I put in some text from an online version of "Might is Right", which celebrates social darwinism and is in the vein of condemning the "weak" and "feminine", and I got this result:
Words: 885
Female Score: 725
Male Score: 1194
"In this arid wilderness of steel and stone, I raise up my voice that you may hear! To
the East and to the West I beckon. To the North and to the South I show a sign, proclaiming "Death to the weakling, wealth to the strong".
Posted by: Summerisle | April 19, 2007 at 11:46 PM
Well that settles it: Digby is a man.
Posted by: Ginger Yellow | April 20, 2007 at 12:31 AM
Words: 397
(NOTE: The genie works best on texts of more than 500 words.)
Female Score: 728
Male Score: 424
The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!!
Hmmm.
Then again, I was cussing out Kos for his sexist indifference and refusal to apologize for recent damage done in the test sample I submitted....
Posted by: Bruce/Crablaw | April 20, 2007 at 01:22 AM
It turns out that my writing resembles that of a crustacean.
Posted by: shrimplate | April 20, 2007 at 12:35 PM
I was quite surprised. This worked very well!
Posted by: konagod | April 21, 2007 at 08:09 PM
Apparently I'm all man. MAN MAN MAN! Never would have guessed it - but I have a theory:
for those of us trained in academic writing styles, perhaps since we are (theoretically) writing to an all-"male" audience, we have actually been trained to write like "men".
(I like my theory, and it fits in with socialization patterns).
Alternatively, as a queer woman maybe I am just inherently more butch.
Posted by: Cara-he | April 22, 2007 at 02:55 PM