Bush tours once-squalid latrine
Bush Tourts Once-Squalid Latrine FORT BRAGG, N.C., May 22 -- President Bush toured a spic-and-span latrine Thursday that appeared vastly improved from a month ago, when an Internet video showed raw sewage and peeling paint in barracks used to house U.S. troops returning from Afghanistan.
U.S. Army officials said $3 million has been spent since then on improvements to the Korean War-era barracks, which will eventually be replaced as part of a massive military infrastructure plan.
"These buildings are coming down," Bush said after a tour of the restroom, which was freshly painted and devoid of mold, peeling paint or other shortcomings shown in the video. "And I know you appreciate it. The soldiers appreciate it." [WaPo]
You know what else soldiers will appreciate, the GI bill that Bush has threatened to veto.
The bill was carried by bipartisan majorities in the House and the Senate.
John McCain opposes the veteran's benefits package, but he didn't dare vote against it. McCain was one of only 3 senators to miss the vote on the GI Bill 2008.
Of the three absentee senators: Tom Coburn was called away for funeral, Ted Kennedy was sidelined with a recently-diagnosed brain tumor, and John McCain had no excuse.
Both Obama and Clinton voted for the GI bill.
I think it was actually Tom Coburn who was at a funeral
Posted by: alex | May 23, 2008 at 05:57 PM
Senate Roll Call on GI Bill
Not Voting - 3
Coburn (R-OK)
Kennedy (D-MA)
McCain (R-AZ)
Posted by: Eric Jaffa | May 23, 2008 at 06:44 PM
Squalid latrine indeed. I never stopped to think whether Commander Codpiece ever had to deal with a filthy can on any sort of regular basis. Perhaps in boot camp he had to cope with a lack of privacy, but boot camp latrines are not neglected when inductees who need a bit of humiliation are available to clean them, so they wouldn’t be dirty. Midland Texas? Andover? Yale fraternity? Texas Air National Guard “Champaign Squadron”? Texas governor’s mansion? White House? No shitty crappers there. Perhaps during his drinking days he took leaks and an occasional puke in a few nasty bar toilets. I guess that counts.
McCain’s voting record on supporting vets has been somewhat less than helpful. Funny, coming from a member of the party that has made so much hay out of the returning Vietnam vets being spat upon legend.
Posted by: cfrost | May 24, 2008 at 12:12 AM
Obviously the tax hike included in the bill had something to do with conservative opposition to it. The reporting of that fact has been so scant that it is frankly dishonest.
Posted by: chad | May 24, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Obviously the tax hike included in the bill had something to do with conservative opposition to it.
So much for sacrifice and solidarity with the soldiers. Dodging taxes is apparently only thing conservatives stand for anymore.
Posted by: cfrost | May 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM
Actually, it's the conservatives who have been evasive about the financing of the GI bill. The mainstream media have explained the financing really well.
Posted by: Lindsay Beyerstein | May 24, 2008 at 01:02 AM
"Obviously the tax hike included in the bill had something to do with conservative opposition to it."
Well, I've never heard an obsolete destroyer or damaged combat helmet complain about its benefits, or the trauma its been through; I don't know why these fucking soldiers can't be more grateful for the thrilling, romantic, twice-or-thrice-in-a-lifetime experience their government has provided for them. On the other hand, Chad (and I do hate to be the one to break to this to you), those foreign investors aren't just giving us all that money; they're going to demand to be paid back at some point.
Posted by: Cass | May 24, 2008 at 10:45 AM
McCain thinks that the GI bill was too nice to soldiers who's "only" served one term in
hellIraq, and should only be nice to people who've spent 8 or 12 years.link.
Jackass.
Posted by: Josh Jasper | May 24, 2008 at 10:57 AM
"The Administration sided with McCain, arguing benefits that were too generous and too early in active duty service would hurt reenlistments -- and would lure service members off of military bases and onto college campuses. 'My job is to get people to stay in the military, not only to join, but to stay as well,' McCain said from the campaign trail in Ohio Wednesday."
Soldiers lured "off of military bases and onto college campuses" I think we can all agree what a horrific spectacle that would be. In domestic violence, this is called "stranding": cutting off escape routes and other possibilities for the victim's life, so she feels trapped in a situation she might otherwise choose to walk out of this afternoon. Of course McCain isn't really being malicious, he just, basically, agrees with that political philosopher:
"What is the life of an individual soldier? The needs of the State must prevail. Soldiers die... the State is forever."
Posted by: Cass | May 24, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Lindsay, the fact that the tax hike was reported in the NYT does not show that it was generally well reported. Maybe I'm just not looking in the right places, but it seemed underreported to me.
I'd bet the conservatives who opposed this bill would've voted in favor of a similarly funded increase in *pay* for soldiers that was paid for by cutting spending elsewhere. So they aren't anti-veteran, they're just against "tax and spend" policies of this sort. Perhaps their opposition to such policies is a mistake, but that would be a mistake in their political views, not a character defect or a negative attitude towards veterans.
Posted by: chad | May 24, 2008 at 07:18 PM
they're just against "tax and spend" policies of this sort
Maybe if the "conservatives" hadn't poured a half trillion $$ down the Iraq rat hole, we wouldn't have to tax anyone.
Posted by: cfrost | May 25, 2008 at 12:24 AM
Anyway, if they've really spent $3 million on those barracks they shouldn't need to replace them any time soon.
Posted by: Gag Halfrunt | May 27, 2008 at 05:45 AM