Dispatch from the war on Christmas: Dogtivity
I wonder who was offended by the dogtivity scene in the window of this Carroll Gardens pet supply store. Judging by the neighborhood, I'm guessing it was either a Christian or a cat person. I doubt a secularist killjoy was responsible. Carroll Gardens has plenty of human/barnyard/camel nativity scenes and nobody seems to mind.
There are many older Catholics in CG, as you know. Do you really not see how someone might take offense by dogs portraying religious figures? (I think it's a cute idea. But that doesn't really matter.)
Posted by: eastriver | December 22, 2009 at 09:48 PM
Had to be a cat person. Definition of purrgatory: Another day with humans.
Posted by: (O)CT(O)PUS | December 23, 2009 at 12:07 AM
Nah. The three king dogs finally showed up and they all went off to play some poker and smoke a few stogies.
Posted by: cfrost | December 23, 2009 at 04:20 AM
I'm offended by the quotation marks.
Posted by: Supergee | December 23, 2009 at 06:39 AM
The only thing offensive about that is that some of the dogs look more like bears.
Posted by: Matt | December 23, 2009 at 09:05 AM
Nativity scenes are a form of idolatry. Of course they are offensive.
Posted by: Weaseldog | December 23, 2009 at 10:03 AM
That is really sad that a DogTivity scene would be considered offensive.
I would hope that Jesus can forgive the owner of the shop for this serious transgression.
Posted by: Weaseldog | December 23, 2009 at 03:29 PM
More lame than offensive
Posted by: The Phantom | December 23, 2009 at 06:35 PM
I couldn't care less about the dog nativity but I'm kind of impressed at the ingenuity of hanging the sign with a suction cup and a clip-hanger.
Posted by: Thomas | December 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM
"Purrgatory,"(O)CT(O)PUS?
I would say that whoever coined "dogtivity" had an ear for the impious, and since it was bound to offend someone simply because of the meanings of the terms so impishly portmanteau'd, they'd insist, as an article of faith, that it be excised as a substitute for excising the impious ear -- but wouldn't that be too dogmas-of-imp-ear-excision?
As for who the offended killjoys were: pardon my diction, but the facts of the case might lead us to suspect certain
bitches.
Posted by: Dabodius | December 24, 2009 at 02:30 PM
Dog is God spelled backwards, so what's the fuss?
Cat people would have used humans worshiping a kitten in the cradle - cats would have screamed BLASPHEMY!!! (Unless, of course, that cat was in the cradle).
As my cat keeps telling me: "I am the Lord thy Cat - thou shalt not have false cats before me." The cat then starts singing: "Bow down before the cat you serve - cats always get what they deserve..."
Posted by: RepubAnon | December 27, 2009 at 12:11 AM